Twitter: Ryan Cunningham
Early last evening I began watching a movie that I was unsure was not already previously watched by me, but I gave 1998's Urban Legend a shot regardless because Alicia Witt had a lead role.
I watched until soon after the murder of her character's Goth roommate, and then cancelled out of the flick. That was the third murder ─ and the second one in the presence of Alicia's character, whose obliviousness to the actual murdering of her roommate (Alicia's character simply believed her unfriendly Goth roommate was having noisy sex in bed in the very same room that they shared as a bedroom) capped my upset with her and the disgusting move.
The first murder's setup was absolutely familiar ─ I had either watched it before, or else it was a theme that had been used in other movies or T.V. shows. Whatever the case, I thought that it was rather convenient for the murderer that when from the back seat of a car where he had been hiding, he was able to use his axe to decapitate the woman who was driving the car down a night highway, and the car apparently simply came to an almost immediate standstill.
The second murder involved such complex prior arrangement off in a secluded wooded area where Alicia and her male companion had driven ─ he in the hope of 'getting it on' with her ─ that if the murderer truly was selecting his victims based upon their past or present involvement with Alicia's character, then this murder was impossible. How could the murderer know where Alicia's male companion was spontaneously going to take her? Or even that the two of them were together, for the murderer would already have to be in waiting?
It was absolutely preposterous.
The third murder taking place in Alicia's 'bedroom' as she lay seeking sleep while her roommate was being killed just a few feet away from her was beyond acceptable.
I turned the movie off and instead watched an episode of a T.V. show, and then awaited my younger brother's homecoming from his daily socializing. Actually, I had grown tired enough that just after 9 p.m. I went upstairs to my bedroom and lay in my bed for what turned out to be approximately an hour ─ I must have almost fallen asleep.
I no sooner went downstairs than I noticed that my brother was just then backing into our open-sided double carport. It was just past 10 p.m.
Not that my brother was to watch much of it (he was largely unconscious by then), but I put our Android TV Box to use again and tuned in what I feel was probably the poorest movie thus far in the old British T.V. series Edgar Wallace Mysteries ─ September 1962's Locker Sixty-Nine.
Thus far we have watched every one of those movies in sequence to this point ─ or at least, I have; sometimes my brother passes out during them.
Note that the movies all seem to be available at OK.ru ─ this is the link for Locker Sixty-Nine. I think that this is the first movie in the series in which no one was actually murdered.
Anyway, as usual, we watched T.V. until well into the midnight hour before calling it a night, and it was well past 1 a.m. by the time I got into bed.
We rose to a clear blue sky that lasted all of today. I never set foot into it, but my brother left here around 1 p.m. professing his intention to get in a walk somewhere before reengaging his daily socializing.
By then, we had watched some more T.V. together. Of note first was BitChute's The Sequel to the Fall of the Cabal - Part 14: Depopulation.
The New World Order’s main focus is complete world dominance. Population control, better known as Depopulation, is the UN’s tool to annihilate the majority of the masses, so that no more than 500 million people are left on the face of the earth. A neat number, easy to control, dominate and subjugate. How are we, the people, being attacked in the name of population control? By means of 10 different Extinction Tools. Let’s take a look at the first 4: wars, (natural?) disasters, famine & drought, and plagues & diseases…
BitChute has a number of different sources for that video, but this one seems to be the original.
Thereafter I tuned in an episode streamed to Rumble two days ago by The Last American Vagabond: Your Annual Bivalent/mRNA COVID (And Everything Else) Jabs, EcoHealth's New Funding & Pfizer Caught?
All Video Source Links Can Be Found Here At The Last American Vagabond: https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/your-annual-bivalent-mrna-covid-and-everything-else-jabs-ecohealths-new-funding-pfizer-caught
The video was almost 3½ hours long (3:28:57). Although we watched until just after 12:30 p.m., we still have almost another 1½ hours to go, so we cancelled out of the video. It was interesting enough that we may continue tomorrow, but that will probably be dependant upon timing.
My brother never even sought some bed rest before heading out for the day. Not me ─ I need my naps or else I cannot handle the eyestrain of blogging.
I received a text from my wife this morning ─ it would have been late afternoon or early evening for her, for she is in Rome (Italy) visiting a sister of hers who lives in that country.
Essentially, my wife admitted to being bored already, even though she only arrived there early Tuesday (Italian time). It is obviously weighing hard upon her that she is unable to do much on her own, since she does not have her car ─ even if she understood what driving is like over there, and knew how to get about.
I also got a couple of annoying E-mails from my older (she is around 80 by now) half-sister.
First at 10:20 a.m. she sent me this, also asking if my wife had yet left for Italy:
I tried to post my comment, but format is changed and my additions and comments seem to disappear. Anyway, wondering if our family has made any comments either in support or otherwise?
That's exactly what she said ─ I have not exchanged messages with her in perhaps a week, so I had no idea what in blazes she was going on about.
And so I replied with this at 12:51 p.m., first letting her know that my wife had left on the 23rd:
As for the other question, I'm afraid that you and I do not have any kind of mystical mind meld, P......, so I have no idea what you wanted to comment about (on Facebook, I assume), or what you are wondering "our family" may or may not have supported.
Context, please.
Clear enough, right?
Well, she did not reply back until 3:49 p.m.:
Basically, I hoped that relatives on F.B. would see that I agreed (and whether or not they also agreed) might evoke an intelligent (?) response back. My impression is they're mostly beyond that reality.
Is that clearer for you? Me neither ─ although I now saw that she was going on about something in Facebook.
My reply:
Agreed to what, P......?
Were you maybe talking with someone else and think that I somehow was part of that discussion?
"Agreed to what?"
I don't know what you were looking at.
As yet there has been no answer.
She can be so frustrating!
It is my intention to get out early this evening to do a little local grocery shopping, so I am going to sign off for today. I want to get in some exercising beforehand.
No comments:
Post a Comment